Ernest Miller: The Obsessively Annotated Introduction to the INDUCE Act

archives by topic

about
- me
- site
brainfarts
interests
- anti
- au
- comp
- crypto
- debian
- flying
- humour
- tinkering
- usenet
mystuff
- kuvert
still-not-king

archives by date

2003 (3)
- Dec (3)
2004 (231)
- Jan (55)
- Feb (17)
- Mar (17)
- Apr (15)
- May (11)
- Jun (26)
- Jul (22)
- Aug (21)
- Sep (18)
- Oct (2)
- Nov (15)
- Dec (12)
2005 (140)
- Jan (21)
- Feb (17)
- Mar (11)
- Apr (13)
- May (9)
- Jun (14)
- Jul (6)
- Aug (10)
- Sep (9)
- Oct (11)
- Nov (9)
- Dec (10)
2006 (95)
- Jan (8)
- Feb (14)
- Mar (14)
- Apr (5)
- May (7)
- Jun (15)
- Jul (4)
- Aug (3)
- Sep (10)
- Oct (7)
- Nov (6)
- Dec (2)
2007 (92)
- Jan (3)
- Feb (12)
- Mar (8)
- Apr (9)
- May (9)
- Jun (5)
- Jul (8)
- Aug (1)
- Sep (18)
- Oct (7)
- Nov (4)
- Dec (8)
2008 (72)
- Jan (6)
- Feb (5)
- Mar (8)
- Apr (11)
- May (9)
- Jun (9)
- Jul (5)
- Aug (5)
- Sep (3)
- Oct (3)
- Nov (6)
- Dec (2)
2009 (39)
- Jan (2)
- Feb (2)
- Mar (6)
- Apr (10)
- May (2)
- Jun (2)
- Jul (5)
- Aug (2)
- Sep (2)
- Oct (2)
- Nov (2)
- Dec (2)
2010 (54)
- Jan (4)
- Feb (4)
- Mar (2)
- Apr (7)
- May (4)
- Jul (8)
- Aug (7)
- Sep (5)
- Oct (2)
- Nov (6)
- Dec (5)
2011 (56)
- Jan (4)
- Feb (3)
- Mar (9)
- Apr (5)
- May (4)
- Jun (5)
- Jul (5)
- Aug (5)
- Sep (7)
- Nov (3)
- Dec (6)
2012 (15)
- Jan (2)
- Mar (6)
- Apr (3)
- May (4)

home / interests / anti / hatch-dissected

Ernest Miller: The Obsessively Annotated Introduction to the INDUCE Act

As mentioned in my other posting there's this absolutely insidious law proposal floating around. Ernest Miller haspublished a superb rebuttal.
Link to Ernest's rebuttal

[ Sat 26.06.2004 00:00 | /interests/anti | comment ]